# GoodVibeCode

> A job board, independent tool-comparison library, and research hub for AI-assisted software development.

## Primary sections

- [Jobs](https://www.goodvibecode.com/): Active vibe coding roles
- [State of Vibe Coding Jobs](https://www.goodvibecode.com/report): Original, live jobs-market data
- [Salary guide](https://www.goodvibecode.com/jobs/salary): Listing-derived compensation data and methodology
- [AI coding tools](https://www.goodvibecode.com/tools): Tool profiles
- [Tool comparisons](https://www.goodvibecode.com/compare): Head-to-head commercial comparisons
- [Vibe coding guides](https://www.goodvibecode.com/vibecoding): Educational guides

## Featured comparisons (Markdown)

- [Aider vs Claude Code](https://www.goodvibecode.com/compare/claude-code-vs-aider.md): Choose Aider when open-source control, provider choice, local models, or scriptable Git workflows matter most. Choose Claude Code when you want Anthropic's managed agent experience, built-in tools, subagents, and MCP integrations. The model matters, but the larger decision is who controls the runtime and billing.
- [Cursor vs Aider](https://www.goodvibecode.com/compare/cursor-vs-aider.md): Choose Cursor when you want completions, chat, agents, diffs, and code review inside one polished editor. Choose Aider when you want an open-source, terminal-native workflow with provider choice and easy use on remote machines or in scripts. They can coexist, but avoid letting both edit the same files at the same time.
- [Cursor vs Claude Code](https://www.goodvibecode.com/compare/cursor-vs-claude-code.md): Choose Cursor when you want AI embedded throughout a visual editor: completion, chat, diffs, agents, and cloud tasks. Choose Claude Code when you want Anthropic's terminal-first agent, scriptable workflows, subagents, and MCP integrations. Many teams can use both, but should define which agent owns each task.
- [OpenAI Codex vs Claude Code](https://www.goodvibecode.com/compare/codex-vs-claude-code.md): Choose OpenAI Codex if you want a coding agent across ChatGPT, desktop, CLI, IDE, and delegated cloud workflows. Choose Claude Code if you want Anthropic's focused, terminal-centered agent and Claude model ecosystem. Both are strong on repository-level engineering; your preferred interface, provider, and deployment model should decide it.
- [OpenAI Codex vs Cursor](https://www.goodvibecode.com/compare/codex-vs-cursor.md): Choose Cursor if you want AI woven into a familiar VS Code-style editor with fast completions and interactive visual diffs. Choose OpenAI Codex if you want a development agent that moves across ChatGPT, desktop, terminal, IDE, and delegated cloud tasks. They can also complement each other: use Cursor as the editor and Codex for larger agent-driven work.
- [Windsurf vs GitHub Copilot](https://www.goodvibecode.com/compare/windsurf-vs-copilot.md): Choose Windsurf's current Devin Desktop experience when you want a dedicated agentic editor and are comfortable adopting its evolving product ecosystem. Choose GitHub Copilot when you need support across multiple IDEs, GitHub-native code review and delegation, or a more established enterprise rollout path.

## Editorial and discovery

- [Full machine-readable index](https://www.goodvibecode.com/llms-full.txt)
- [Editorial policy](https://www.goodvibecode.com/editorial-policy)
- [Sitemap](https://www.goodvibecode.com/sitemap.xml)
- [RSS feed](https://www.goodvibecode.com/feed.xml)

GoodVibeCode uses AI for drafting or analysis where useful, but published factual claims remain subject to editorial review. Verify volatile product pricing and availability with the linked vendors.