GoodVibeCode
Compare/Cursor vs Windsurf

Cursor vs Windsurf

AI Code Editors

Our Verdict

Cursor is the top pick for developers who want the most advanced AI coding features, the largest ecosystem, and the fastest release cadence. Windsurf is a strong alternative that offers similar capabilities at a lower price, making it great for budget-conscious developers or those who prefer Cascade's agentic workflow.

Cursor vs Windsurf — Full Comparison for 2026

Cursor and Windsurf are the two leading AI-native code editors, both built on VS Code's foundation. They compete head-to-head for the same audience: developers who want a deeply integrated AI experience rather than a bolt-on extension. Here's how they stack up in 2026.

Feature Comparison

FeatureCursorWindsurf
Code CompletionTab-based, predicts next editFast inline completions
AI AgentComposer + Background Agents (BugBot)Cascade — multi-step agentic AI
Multi-file EditingComposer handles multi-file edits nativelyCascade plans and executes across files
ChatCodebase-aware with @mentionsInline chat + Cascade context
Memory.cursorrules + project memoryMemories system — learns preferences
Model SupportClaude, GPT-4o, Gemini, and moreGPT-4o, Claude, Codeium models
MCP SupportYes — extensive ecosystemLimited MCP support
Background AgentsBugBot for autonomous GitHub issue workNot available
Terminal IntegrationAI terminal commandsCascade can run terminal commands
Image InputScreenshot/design to codeImage understanding for UI tasks
Extension EcosystemFull VS Code compatibilityVS Code compatible (some gaps)
Release CadenceWeekly updates, fast iterationLess frequent, larger releases
CommunityLarge, active community with rules/skills/MCPsSmaller but growing community

Pricing Comparison

PlanCursorWindsurf
Free2,000 completions, 50 slow requestsUnlimited basic completions, limited Cascade
Pro$20/mo$15/mo
Business/Teams$40/mo$30/mo

Bottom line on pricing: Windsurf is $5/mo cheaper at every tier and has a more generous free plan. Cursor charges more but ships features faster and has a larger ecosystem. For most developers, the $5 difference isn't decisive — pick based on features.

Target Audience

Choose Cursor if you are:

  • A power user who wants the latest AI features as soon as they ship
  • A developer who values community (rules, skills, MCP servers)
  • Someone who needs background agents for autonomous work
  • Building complex projects that benefit from the best multi-file editing
  • Part of a team that already standardized on Cursor

Choose Windsurf if you are:

  • Budget-conscious and want to save $5/mo
  • Drawn to Cascade's structured, plan-first agentic approach
  • A developer who values the Memories system for persistent preferences
  • Looking for a generous free tier to try before committing
  • Comfortable with a smaller community and less frequent updates

Use Case Recommendations

Use CaseBest ChoiceWhy
Multi-file feature implementationCursorComposer is more mature and reliable
Autonomous background workCursorBugBot works on GitHub issues while you code
Budget-friendly AI editorWindsurf$15/mo vs $20/mo, better free tier
Learning a new codebaseTieBoth have excellent codebase understanding
Using external tools (MCP)CursorMuch larger MCP ecosystem
Remembering project conventionsTieBoth have memory/rules systems
Prototyping a new projectTieBoth handle greenfield projects well
Enterprise deploymentCursorMore established, better team features
Quick inline code suggestionsTieBoth have excellent completions
AI-planned refactoringWindsurfCascade's planning is very structured

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Windsurf a copy of Cursor? No. While both are built on VS Code, Windsurf (by Codeium) was developed independently. Codeium has been building AI coding tools since 2022, predating even Cursor's launch. Cascade represents Codeium's unique approach to agentic AI.

Did OpenAI buy Windsurf/Codeium? Yes, OpenAI acquired Codeium (the company behind Windsurf) in late 2025. This gives Windsurf access to OpenAI's resources and models, but it remains to be seen how this affects the product roadmap and Windsurf's independence.

Can I import my Cursor settings to Windsurf (or vice versa)? Both editors support VS Code settings import. You can try both with your existing configuration and switch relatively painlessly.

Which has better code completion? Both are excellent. Cursor's completions are often praised for predicting your next intended edit (not just the next line). Windsurf's completions are very fast and accurate. In practice, the difference is marginal.

Which editor is more stable? Cursor ships more frequent updates, which occasionally introduces bugs that are quickly fixed. Windsurf releases less often with more thorough testing. Both are production-ready.

Should I switch from Cursor to Windsurf to save money? If $5/mo matters to you and you don't rely on Cursor-specific features like BugBot or the MCP ecosystem, Windsurf is a solid choice. Try the free tier before committing.